Essay --

Mindy PangPearl Final (Analysis /Synthesis)1. I think it is ironical that gum kino is macrocosm followed by trackers because all through break through the story, Kino be fuddles connections with sensuals. Kino and Juana atomic number 18 compared to being animate beings that are chased down by hunters. As Kino is supposedly an animal, it is ironic because trackers are known to follow animals. provided like animals, Kino and Juana try to escape the hunters, going to the mountains, where there is superior elevation, something an animal would do. Another example of Kinos compari news to an animal is when Kino needs to find a strategy in which the trackers wont see him, so he takes off his clothes (what us, cosmos wear), as an animalistic technique, since animals dont wear clothes. His own son also becomes an animal, at least to the trackers, who think the babys shout out was a coyote cry, and this causes Coyotitos death by a gunfire from them. This also brings us to the irony o f Coyotitos name, and as readers, we find out why he was named this at the end of the story. Steinbeck also describes the characters literally as animals for example, Kino hissed at her like a snake, and Juana stared at him with wide, unfrightened eye like a sheep before the thocher. Not only does this help us picture what is going on, but the author is also trying to make more references to animals. These are only a few of the examples of when the author creates animal imagery/ reference, but because the author compares Kino and his family to animals so often, it is ironic how they is being followed by trackers. 3. The brief introduction connects to rest of the story very well. washstand Steinbeck explains the books parable. The introduction is pretty self-explanatory. The story is not fair(a) about Kino, it i... ...d to harm Kino, mugging him, injuring him, attempting many times to steal the osseous tissue, destroying his strange pearl. Kino could no longer protect himself, like he employ to. He tried his best, but now his protection shell has been crackers and he is no longer as strong as he used to be, just like an oyster without a pearl. The oyster protects its incomparable pearl on purpose, and has a shell to help protect it, but when the pearler forces the shell open, the protection is gone. The canoe had its wood, as a class of protection, blocking out things on the outside that could potentially harm things that are inside the boat, but the canoe was destroyed and its protection is now useless. Kino, the canoe, and the pearl all caused and meant trouble. Now they all have lost, they have all shattered, they have been destroyed. Now, they all represent and have become something else.